[llvm] [XCOFF] make related SD symbols as isFunction (PR #69553)
Chen Zheng via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Nov 10 00:19:19 PST 2023
================
@@ -1242,15 +1242,72 @@ bool XCOFFSymbolRef::isFunction() const {
const XCOFFCsectAuxRef CsectAuxRef = ExpCsectAuxEnt.get();
- // A function definition should be a label definition.
- // FIXME: This is not necessarily the case when -ffunction-sections is
- // enabled.
- if (!CsectAuxRef.isLabel())
+ if (CsectAuxRef.getStorageMappingClass() != XCOFF::XMC_PR &&
+ CsectAuxRef.getStorageMappingClass() != XCOFF::XMC_GL)
return false;
- if (CsectAuxRef.getStorageMappingClass() != XCOFF::XMC_PR)
+ // A function definition should not be a common type symbol or a external
+ // symbol.
+ if (CsectAuxRef.getSymbolType() == XCOFF::XTY_CM ||
+ CsectAuxRef.getSymbolType() == XCOFF::XTY_ER)
return false;
+ // If the next symbol is a XTY_LD type symbol with same address, this XTY_SD
+ // symbol is not a function. Otherwise this is a function symbol for
+ // -ffunction-sections.
+ if (CsectAuxRef.getSymbolType() == XCOFF::XTY_SD) {
+ // If this is a csect with size 0, it won't be a function definition.
+ // This is used to hack situation that llvm always generates below symbol
+ // for -ffunction-sections:
+ // m 0x00000000 .text 1 unamex **No Symbol**
+ // a4 0x00000000 0 0 SD PR 0 0
+ if (getSize() == 0)
+ return false;
+
+ uint8_t NumberOfAuxEntries = getNumberOfAuxEntries();
+
+ // If this is the last main symbol table entry, there won't be XTY_LD type
+ // symbol below.
+ if (getEntryAddress() == getObject()->getSymbolEntryAddressByIndex(
+ getObject()->getNumberOfSymbolTableEntries() -
+ NumberOfAuxEntries - 1))
+ return true;
+
+ DataRefImpl Ref;
+ Ref.p = XCOFFObjectFile::getAdvancedSymbolEntryAddress(
+ getEntryAddress(), NumberOfAuxEntries + 1);
+ XCOFFSymbolRef NextSym = getObject()->toSymbolRef(Ref);
+ if (!NextSym.isCsectSymbol())
+ return true;
+
+ Expected<uint64_t> SymbolAddressOrErr = getAddress();
+ if (!SymbolAddressOrErr)
+ return false;
+
+ Expected<uint64_t> NextSymbolAddressOrErr = NextSym.getAddress();
+ if (!NextSymbolAddressOrErr)
+ return true;
+
+ if (SymbolAddressOrErr.get() != NextSymbolAddressOrErr.get())
+ return true;
+
+ // Check next symbol is XTY_LD. If so, this symbol is not a function.
+ Expected<XCOFFCsectAuxRef> NextCsectAuxEnt = NextSym.getXCOFFCsectAuxRef();
+ if (!NextCsectAuxEnt) {
+ // If the next symbol has no aux entries, won't be a XTY_LD symbol.
+ consumeError(NextCsectAuxEnt.takeError());
----------------
chenzheng1030 wrote:
For csect symbol, a valid symbol is required to have at least one aux entry.
However the function `getXCOFFCsectAuxRef()` also only check for `isCsectSymbol` but it reports several kinds of errors, for example a invalid object. I think here we should not assume there is no error reported from this function and should just skip these errors?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69553
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list