[llvm] [DAG] Remove OneUse restriction on sext when folding (shl (sext (add_nsw x, c1)), c2) (PR #68972)

[via llvm-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:


<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->

:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff f8325f12606d7c8510abbf933bf95983bf66da7d 9efabd4fd4823a71a6c04400447ff3d60ad78eaf -- llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.h
``````````

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
index a0922c8ad0a9..58535cca4901 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
@@ -3376,8 +3376,8 @@ bool X86TargetLowering::isDesirableToCommuteWithShift(
           N->getOpcode() == ISD::SRL) &&
          "Expected shift op");
   SDValue N0 = N->getOperand(0).getOpcode() == ISD::SIGN_EXTEND
-                    ? N->getOperand(0)->getOperand(0)
-                    : N->getOperand(0);
+                   ? N->getOperand(0)->getOperand(0)
+                   : N->getOperand(0);
   return N0.hasOneUse();
 }
 

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68972