[llvm] [BOLT] Support instrumentation hook via DT_FINI_ARRAY (PR #67348)
Vladislav Khmelevsky via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Sep 26 07:26:16 PDT 2023
================
@@ -1276,6 +1280,60 @@ void RewriteInstance::discoverFileObjects() {
registerFragments();
}
+Error RewriteInstance::discoverFiniAddress() {
+ // If FiniFunctionAddress is already set, we got if from DT_FINI. We use
+ // DT_FINI instead of DT_FINI_ARRAY if it's available.
+ if (BC->FiniFunctionAddress)
+ return Error::success();
+
+ if (BC->IsStaticExecutable)
+ return Error::success();
+
+ if (!BC->FiniArrayAddress || !BC->FiniArraySize) {
+ return createStringError(
+ std::errc::not_supported,
+ "Instrumentation needs either DT_FINI or DT_FINI_ARRAY");
+ }
+
+ if (*BC->FiniArraySize < BC->AsmInfo->getCodePointerSize()) {
+ return createStringError(std::errc::not_supported,
+ "Need at least 1 DT_FINI_ARRAY slot");
+ }
+
+ ErrorOr<BinarySection &> FiniArraySection =
+ BC->getSectionForAddress(*BC->FiniArrayAddress);
+ if (auto EC = FiniArraySection.getError())
+ return errorCodeToError(EC);
+
+ BC->FiniArraySection = &*FiniArraySection;
+ const Relocation *FiniFunctionReloc =
+ FiniArraySection->getDynamicRelocationAt(0);
+
+ if (!FiniFunctionReloc) {
+ return createStringError(std::errc::not_supported,
----------------
yota9 wrote:
I see. Then probably rewriting the address is the only way. Well it seems fine, we're doing it for dynamic relocs, .dynamic & etc, so maybe it is not a big deal to patch also init_array values for runtime library cases..
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67348
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list