[llvm] [BOLT] Support instrumentation hook via DT_FINI_ARRAY (PR #67348)

[Vladislav Khmelevsky via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -1276,6 +1280,60 @@ void RewriteInstance::discoverFileObjects() {
   registerFragments();
 }
 
+Error RewriteInstance::discoverFiniAddress() {
+  // If FiniFunctionAddress is already set, we got if from DT_FINI. We use
+  // DT_FINI instead of DT_FINI_ARRAY if it's available.
+  if (BC->FiniFunctionAddress)
+    return Error::success();
+
+  if (BC->IsStaticExecutable)
+    return Error::success();
+
+  if (!BC->FiniArrayAddress || !BC->FiniArraySize) {
+    return createStringError(
+        std::errc::not_supported,
+        "Instrumentation needs either DT_FINI or DT_FINI_ARRAY");
+  }
+
+  if (*BC->FiniArraySize < BC->AsmInfo->getCodePointerSize()) {
+    return createStringError(std::errc::not_supported,
+                             "Need at least 1 DT_FINI_ARRAY slot");
+  }
+
+  ErrorOr<BinarySection &> FiniArraySection =
+      BC->getSectionForAddress(*BC->FiniArrayAddress);
+  if (auto EC = FiniArraySection.getError())
+    return errorCodeToError(EC);
+
+  BC->FiniArraySection = &*FiniArraySection;
+  const Relocation *FiniFunctionReloc =
+      FiniArraySection->getDynamicRelocationAt(0);
+
+  if (!FiniFunctionReloc) {
+    return createStringError(std::errc::not_supported,
----------------
yota9 wrote:

I belive it should be done in this review. It seems to be not so problematic. For all binaries you should patch static reloc (although RELA relocations doesn't really need this, but RELR needs, and still it would be nice to check the address update using objdump). And for pie binaries also change dynamic reloc. Also it won't hurt to get the first non-pie binary test for risc-v :))

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67348