[PATCH] D158161: [RISCV] Don't relax policy to ta when vmerge's VL shrinks during folding
Philip Reames via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Aug 17 11:53:35 PDT 2023
reames added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelDAGToDAG.cpp:3512
+ bool MergeVLShrunk = VL != OrigVL;
+ uint64_t Policy = (isImplicitDef(Merge) && !MergeVLShrunk) ? RISCVII::TAIL_AGNOSTIC : /*TUMU*/ 0;
SDValue PolicyOp =
----------------
reames wrote:
> If instead, we were to change this line to:
> ```
> uint64_t Policy = isImplicitDef(False) ? RISCVII::TAIL_AGNOSTIC : /*TUMU*/ 0;
>
> ```
> What would happen? I'm worried there's some other case we haven't caught where Merge was implicit_def, but the resulting operation has a non-implicit_def result. I think *all* such cases needs to be TU.
Answer: A lot of regressions. I tried this, and it definitely doesn't seem to work.
I'm still a bit worried there's another case here. I don't have anything specific though.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D158161/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D158161
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list