[llvm] 33fad30 - [X86] Fix typo in comment. NFC
Craig Topper via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Jul 22 11:15:52 PDT 2023
Author: Craig Topper
Date: 2023-07-22T11:12:02-07:00
New Revision: 33fad3037d50f6433044fa20a3ec6bf48d71664d
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/33fad3037d50f6433044fa20a3ec6bf48d71664d
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/33fad3037d50f6433044fa20a3ec6bf48d71664d.diff
LOG: [X86] Fix typo in comment. NFC
Added:
Modified:
llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
index ad6f12f6ca6921..bb086471a7709e 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
@@ -30777,7 +30777,7 @@ static SDValue LowerFMINIMUM_FMAXIMUM(SDValue Op, const X86Subtarget &Subtarget,
bool IgnoreNaN = DAG.getTarget().Options.NoNaNsFPMath ||
Op->getFlags().hasNoNaNs() || (IsXNeverNaN && IsYNeverNaN);
- // If we did no ordering operands for singed zero handling and we need
+ // If we did no ordering operands for signed zero handling and we need
// to process NaN and we know that the second operand is not NaN then put
// it in first operand and we will not need to post handle NaN after max/min.
if (IgnoreSignedZero && !IgnoreNaN && DAG.isKnownNeverNaN(NewY))
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list