[llvm] 33fad30 - [X86] Fix typo in comment. NFC

Craig Topper via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Jul 22 11:15:52 PDT 2023


Author: Craig Topper
Date: 2023-07-22T11:12:02-07:00
New Revision: 33fad3037d50f6433044fa20a3ec6bf48d71664d

URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/33fad3037d50f6433044fa20a3ec6bf48d71664d
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/33fad3037d50f6433044fa20a3ec6bf48d71664d.diff

LOG: [X86] Fix typo in comment. NFC

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
index ad6f12f6ca6921..bb086471a7709e 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
@@ -30777,7 +30777,7 @@ static SDValue LowerFMINIMUM_FMAXIMUM(SDValue Op, const X86Subtarget &Subtarget,
   bool IgnoreNaN = DAG.getTarget().Options.NoNaNsFPMath ||
                    Op->getFlags().hasNoNaNs() || (IsXNeverNaN && IsYNeverNaN);
 
-  // If we did no ordering operands for singed zero handling and we need
+  // If we did no ordering operands for signed zero handling and we need
   // to process NaN and we know that the second operand is not NaN then put
   // it in first operand and we will not need to post handle NaN after max/min.
   if (IgnoreSignedZero && !IgnoreNaN && DAG.isKnownNeverNaN(NewY))


        


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list