[PATCH] D155638: [llvm-reduce] Reduce function calling convention
Saleem Abdulrasool via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jul 19 09:53:07 PDT 2023
compnerd added a comment.
In D155638#4515322 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D155638#4515322>, @dblaikie wrote:
> FWIW, I'd consider this a simplification - if I saw a test case that used a novel/explicit calling convention, I'd probably assume/guess that the CC was load bearing/required/interesting/relevant to the bug. So a test case that doesn't use a novel CC is "simpler" in that sense, to me at least. (it's not a guarantee, it's possible the bug is only reproducible with the default CC, but more often than not that's not going to be the case, I think?)
I agree. There are some special cases for some CCs in the codebase, so this definitely helps identify that behavioural difference.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D155638/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D155638
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list