[llvm] 0aed0db - [LCSSA] Don't invalidate entire loop in SCEV
Nikita Popov via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Apr 28 03:17:39 PDT 2023
Author: Nikita Popov
Date: 2023-04-28T12:17:26+02:00
New Revision: 0aed0dbec2434d9d1a41266be009e56cc964633b
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0aed0dbec2434d9d1a41266be009e56cc964633b
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0aed0dbec2434d9d1a41266be009e56cc964633b.diff
LOG: [LCSSA] Don't invalidate entire loop in SCEV
We already invalidate each individual instruction for which LCSSA
is formed in formLCSSAForInstructions(), so I don't see a reason
why we would need to invalidate the entire loop on top of that.
I believe we also no longer need the instruction-level invalidation
now that SCEV looks through LCSSA phis, but I'll leave that for a
separate patch, as it's less obvious.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149331
Added:
Modified:
llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LCSSA.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LCSSA.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LCSSA.cpp
index af79dc456ea6..4b006f5288dc 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LCSSA.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LCSSA.cpp
@@ -395,12 +395,6 @@ bool llvm::formLCSSA(Loop &L, const DominatorTree &DT, const LoopInfo *LI,
IRBuilder<> Builder(L.getHeader()->getContext());
Changed = formLCSSAForInstructions(Worklist, DT, *LI, SE, Builder);
- // If we modified the code, remove any caches about the loop from SCEV to
- // avoid dangling entries.
- // FIXME: This is a big hammer, can we clear the cache more selectively?
- if (SE && Changed)
- SE->forgetLoop(&L);
-
assert(L.isLCSSAForm(DT));
return Changed;
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list