[PATCH] D146974: [test] A test case for D146958
Florian Hahn via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Apr 23 14:34:32 PDT 2023
fhahn added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/vector-no-scevcheck.ll:15
+ %mul0 = mul nsw i64 %i, %val2
+ %arrayidx0 = getelementptr inbounds double, ptr %0, i64 %mul0
+ %mul1 = mul nsw i64 %i, %val1
----------------
pawosm01 wrote:
> fhahn wrote:
> > Could you add a new function that's basically the same as `@foo` but has `%arrayidx0` in `%loop2.header`?
> > Could you add a new function that's basically the same as @foo but has %arrayidx0 in %loop2.header?
>
> This will not expose the same behavior of the D146958 patch we care about in this test (namely, `vector.scevcheck` will remain).
>
Right, but that's only with the current version of the patch; it should be relatively straightforward to also handle this case (https://reviews.llvm.org/D146958#inline-1439048). In any case, it won't hurt to have negative test cases as well.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D146974/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D146974
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list