[PATCH] D147662: [LoopPredication] Fix where we generate widened condition. PR61963
Max Kazantsev via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Apr 5 20:57:47 PDT 2023
mkazantsev added a comment.
I generally agree with the change in code, but can we shrink the test? I'm pretty sure most of things here are not really required.
================
Comment at: llvm/test/Transforms/LoopPredication/pr61963.ll:11
+; CHECK-NEXT: %widenable_cond11 = call i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition
+define i32 @foo(ptr addrspace(3) %arg) !prof !0 {
+bb:
----------------
Is it possible to reduce the test via bugpoint? Just assert whenever you move non-loop-invariant into loop in this transform and let it do the job.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D147662/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D147662
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list