[PATCH] D147368: [LoongArch] Optimize bitwise and with immediates

Lu Weining via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Apr 2 18:51:41 PDT 2023


SixWeining added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/test/CodeGen/LoongArch/ir-instruction/and.ll:348-352
 ; LA64-NEXT:    lu12i.w $a2, 15
 ; LA64-NEXT:    ori $a2, $a2, 4080
 ; LA64-NEXT:    and $a1, $a1, $a2
 ; LA64-NEXT:    and $a0, $a0, $a2
 ; LA64-NEXT:    mul.d $a0, $a0, $a1
----------------
benshi001 wrote:
> SixWeining wrote:
> > It's also a win if optimized to `bstrpick + slli` since we can save a register `$a2`. Right?
> > ```
> > ; LA64-NEXT:    bstrpick.d $a0, $a0, 15, 4
> > ; LA64-NEXT:    slli.d $a0, $a0, 4
> > ; LA64-NEXT:    bstrpick.d $a1, $a1, 15, 4
> > ; LA64-NEXT:    slli.d $a1, $a1, 4
> > ; LA64-NEXT:    mul.d $a0, $a0, $a1
> > ```
> > 
> > But if the immediate `0xfff0` is used 3 times, we have 2 choices:
> > 1. Use less registers but one more instruction.
> > 2. Use less instructions but one more register.
> > 
> > I'm not sure how to balance this.
> > 
> > 
> I am also not sure about the case of more then 2 uses. Maybe we make a convervative choice, just make  it unchanged? And we only handle 1 and 2 uses ?
> 
>  
I agree with you.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D147368/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D147368



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list