[PATCH] D146940: [Analysis] Deprecate (Legacy)DivergenceAnalysis
    Pierre van Houtryve via Phabricator via llvm-commits 
    llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
       
    Thu Mar 30 03:47:06 PDT 2023
    
    
  
Pierre-vh added a comment.
In D146940#4232995 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D146940#4232995>, @nikic wrote:
> I'd prefer deleting this code over adding pragmas. There is no need to deprecate things in C++ API before removal.
I thought we needed to deprecate the analysis first if there are downstream users. Is there a precedent for removing an analysis directly without deprecation?
If so, can you please mention it in the RFC? https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-deprecate-divergenceanalysis-legacydivergenceanalysis/69538/4
I'd also rather just delete it now - especially because there's no reason not to use UA, but I thought deprecation was a mandatory step.
Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D146940/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D146940
    
    
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list