[PATCH] D133273: [compiler-rt][macOS]: Fix building compiler-rt without iOS related SDKs
Dan Liew via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 6 12:22:38 PST 2023
delcypher requested changes to this revision.
delcypher added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
@thieta Thanks for working on this. I don't think can land as is because I'm not convinced this works correctly. Please see my comments.
================
Comment at: compiler-rt/cmake/base-config-ix.cmake:154
+ find_darwin_sdk_dir(HAS_IOS_SDK "iphoneos")
+ set(COMPILER_RT_ENABLE_IOS_DEFAULT ${DEFAULT})
+ if("${HAS_IOS_SDK}" STREQUAL "")
----------------
What is this `${DEFAULT}` variable? Shouldn't this just be:
```
set(COMPILER_RT_ENABLE_IOS_DEFAULT ON)
```
?
================
Comment at: compiler-rt/cmake/base-config-ix.cmake:158
+ endif()
+ option(COMPILER_RT_ENABLE_IOS_DEFAULT "Enable building for iOS" COMPILER_RT_ENABLE_IOS_DEFAULT)
+
----------------
Should this be
```
option(COMPILER_RT_ENABLE_IOS_DEFAULT "Enable building for iOS" ${COMPILER_RT_ENABLE_IOS_DEFAULT})
```
?
I.e.: Explicitly expand the variable?
Although `if()` will implicitly expand variables as noted [[ https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/manual/cmake-language.7.html#variable-references | here ]] I'm not aware of such a behavior for `option()`. Even if this was supported I think we should explicitly expand the variables as is done elsewhere in this source file.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D133273/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D133273
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list