[PATCH] D139209: [IRMover] Remove UB implying parameter attributes when necessary
Tim Neumann via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Feb 1 10:27:48 PST 2023
TimNN marked 3 inline comments as done.
TimNN added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Linker/IRMover.cpp:1577-1579
+ if (DstF && SrcF && DstF->isDeclaration() && !SrcF->isDeclaration()) {
+ assert(DstF->arg_size() == SrcF->arg_size() &&
+ "Dst and Src should have the same signature.");
----------------
tejohnson wrote:
> TimNN wrote:
> > arsenm wrote:
> > > TimNN wrote:
> > > > arsenm wrote:
> > > > > I thought we casted the function type at callsites for different signatures in different modules, so this wouldn't hold?
> > > > @tejohnson do you have any input on this?
> > > >
> > > > (I last looked at this code in-depth in early December, but don't remember seeing anything relevant. `ninja check-all` is also clean and in a brief test `IRMover` would happily import a function with a different signature without creating any bitcasts).
> > > These days it would appear as a callsite with a different type from the callee, there's no explicit bitcast with opaque pointers
> > Ack, then I guess the "brief test" wasn't really useful.
> >
> > Anyway, if it is indeed expected that `SrcF` and `DstF` have different signatures here, I'd appreciate some guidance on how to best detect and handle that.
> Sorry I'm not really sure. @arsenm do you mean that the arg_size could be different? Do you have an example of how/when that would happen?
Friendly ping, @arsenm! Could you provide more details about your concern, or even better, a concrete example?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D139209/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D139209
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list