[PATCH] D140564: [IPSCCP] Create a Pass parameter to control specialization of functions.
Nikita Popov via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Dec 23 03:00:11 PST 2022
nikic added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/test/Transforms/FunctionSpecialization/function-specialization.ll:1
-; RUN: opt -passes=ipsccp -specialize-functions -func-specialization-size-threshold=3 -S < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -passes="ipsccp<func-spec>" -func-specialization-size-threshold=3 -S < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -passes=ipsccp -specialize-functions=true -func-specialization-size-threshold=3 -S < %s | FileCheck %s
----------------
chill wrote:
> For completeness, I'd suggest a few more run lines, so ultimately we cover:
>
> | **Passes** | **Options** |
> | `ipsccp` | none | +
> | `ipsccp` | `-specialize-functions=true` |
> | `ipsccp` | `-specialize-functions=false` |
> | `ipsccp<func-spec>` | none | +
> | `ipsccp<func-spec>` | `-specialize-functions=false` |
> | `ipsccp<no-func-spec>` | none |
> | `ipsccp<no-func-spec>` | `-specialize-functions=true` | +
>
>
>
Maybe drop `-specialize-functions` entirely? Is there any benefit to keeping it if we already have the pass parameter?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D140564/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D140564
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list