[PATCH] D140347: TargetLowering: Teach DemandedBits about VSCALE
Benjamin Maxwell via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Dec 19 16:05:23 PST 2022
MacDue added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp:1136
+ return false;
+ APInt VScaleResultUpperbound(64, *MaxVScale);
+ VScaleResultUpperbound *= Op.getConstantOperandAPInt(0).sextOrTrunc(64);
----------------
compnerd wrote:
> craig.topper wrote:
> > I'm not sure that hardcoding 64 here is the right fix. I think what we need to check is that the multiply doesn't overflow.
> @craig.topper I absolutely agree with you. I call this out in the commit message, that I'm just assuming that this is wide enough. This can potentially overflow still. Is there a good way to ensure that we have the proper width?
My thought was to do:
```
APInt Multiplier = Op.getConstantOperandAPInt(0);
unsigned MultiplyBits = Log2_32(*MaxVScale) + 1 + Multiplier.getActiveBits();
APInt VScaleResultUpperbound = APInt(MultiplyBits, *MaxVScale) * Multiplier.sextOrTrunc(MultiplyBits);
```
Which should always have enough bits to store the full result.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D140347/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D140347
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list