[PATCH] D138774: Enhance stack protector
Mikael Holmén via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Dec 1 23:30:31 PST 2022
uabelho added a comment.
Hello,
I noticed that if the compiler is built with EXPENSIVE_CHECKS on, the stack-protector-no-return.ll testcase fails with
DominatorTree is different than a freshly computed one!
Current:
=============================--------------------------------
Inorder Dominator Tree: DFSNumbers invalid: 0 slow queries.
[1] %entry {4294967295,4294967295} [0]
[2] %unreachable {4294967295,4294967295} [1]
[2] %lpad {4294967295,4294967295} [1]
[3] %invoke.cont {4294967295,4294967295} [2]
[4] %invoke.cont2 {4294967295,4294967295} [3]
[4] %SP_return3 {4294967295,4294967295} [3]
[4] %CallStackCheckFailBlk2 {4294967295,4294967295} [3]
[3] %lpad1 {4294967295,4294967295} [2]
[4] %eh.resume {4294967295,4294967295} [3]
[5] %SP_return6 {4294967295,4294967295} [4]
[5] %CallStackCheckFailBlk5 {4294967295,4294967295} [4]
[4] %terminate.lpad {4294967295,4294967295} [3]
[5] %SP_return9 {4294967295,4294967295} [4]
[5] %CallStackCheckFailBlk8 {4294967295,4294967295} [4]
[2] %SP_return {4294967295,4294967295} [1]
[2] %CallStackCheckFailBlk {4294967295,4294967295} [1]
Roots: %entry
Freshly computed tree:
=============================--------------------------------
Inorder Dominator Tree: DFSNumbers invalid: 0 slow queries.
[1] %entry {4294967295,4294967295} [0]
[2] %SP_return {4294967295,4294967295} [1]
[3] %unreachable {4294967295,4294967295} [2]
[3] %lpad {4294967295,4294967295} [2]
[4] %invoke.cont {4294967295,4294967295} [3]
[5] %SP_return3 {4294967295,4294967295} [4]
[6] %invoke.cont2 {4294967295,4294967295} [5]
[5] %CallStackCheckFailBlk2 {4294967295,4294967295} [4]
[4] %lpad1 {4294967295,4294967295} [3]
[5] %eh.resume {4294967295,4294967295} [4]
[6] %SP_return6 {4294967295,4294967295} [5]
[6] %CallStackCheckFailBlk5 {4294967295,4294967295} [5]
[5] %terminate.lpad {4294967295,4294967295} [4]
[6] %SP_return9 {4294967295,4294967295} [5]
[6] %CallStackCheckFailBlk8 {4294967295,4294967295} [5]
[2] %CallStackCheckFailBlk {4294967295,4294967295} [1]
Roots: %entry
This can also be reproduced on a non-EXPENSIVE_CHECKS build just by adding "-verify-dom-info" to the command line like
llc test/CodeGen/X86/stack-protector-no-return.ll -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -o - -verify-dom-info
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D138774/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D138774
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list