[PATCH] D137882: [DWARFLibrary] Add support to re-construct cu-index

[Alexander Yermolovich via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

ayermolo added a comment.

In D137882#3948380 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D137882#3948380>, @dblaikie wrote:

> I think test coverage might be more suitable if it were a single dedicated test that has a corrupted index, to demonstrate that rebuilding the index comes up with a different (& correct) answer - rather than adding what looks sort of like redundant testing to existing test cases?

I am not sure how to construct corrupted CU Index manually. Would Yaml2Obj be able to do it?
For other tests I think it's ads testing coverage to make sure we are parsing cu/tu indexes correctly.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D137882/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D137882