[PATCH] D138326: [CodeView] Don't generate dummy unnamed strcut/class/union type.

[Reid Kleckner via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

rnk added a subscriber: dblaikie.
rnk added a comment.

Since Clang creates the member list and only adds types for the benefit of codeview, should we change clang instead?

+ at dblaikie



================
Comment at: llvm/test/DebugInfo/COFF/nested-types.ll:214
+; CHECK-NEXT:   }
 ; CHECK-NEXT:   NestedType {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:     TypeLeafKind: LF_NESTTYPE (0x1510)
----------------
So the test shows that we don't have NestedType records for unnamed unions & structs, right?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D138326/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D138326