[PATCH] D138283: [SVE] Enhanced loop access analysis

[Eli Friedman via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

efriedma added a comment.

Please simplify your testcase so it only contains the relevant loop, and doesn't contain any other irrelevant instructions.

I don't understand the relationship between "store that stores a constant value" and "loop has no dependencies"; as far as I can tell, they're unrelated.  Even for your testcase, the load can depend on the store.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D138283/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D138283