[PATCH] D92132: [LV] Support widened induction variables in epilogue vectorization.
Florian Hahn via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Sep 29 04:24:22 PDT 2022
fhahn marked 4 inline comments as done.
fhahn added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:3193
"Inconsistent information about additional bypass.");
DenseMap<const InductionDescriptor *, Value *> ResumeValues;
// We are going to resume the execution of the scalar loop.
----------------
rengolin wrote:
> unused?
This has been removed in the earlier change that did the refactoring, some for the return type fix.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:7903
+
+ if (!any_of(Phi->blocks(), [&](BasicBlock *IncB) {
+ return EPI.EpilogueIterationCountCheck == IncB;
----------------
rengolin wrote:
> A comment here for the semantics of this would be nice
Added a comment, thanks.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10485
- // Ensure that the start values for any VPReductionPHIRecipes are
- // updated before vectorising the epilogue loop.
+ // Ensure that the start values for any VPWidenIntOrFpInductionRecipe, VPWidenPointerInductionRecipe and VPReductionPHIRecipes are updated before vectorizing the epilogue loop.
for (VPRecipeBase &R : Header->phis()) {
----------------
rengolin wrote:
> 80 columns?
Thanks, formatting should be fixed.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10495
+
+ PHINode *IndPhi = nullptr;
+ const InductionDescriptor *ID;
----------------
rengolin wrote:
> This code is hard to follow, perhaps a comment?
Thanks, added a comment.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D92132/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D92132
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list