[PATCH] D112374: [clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare

[David Rector via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

davrec added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/AST/Type.h:5530-5537
 /// Represents a type that was referred to using an elaborated type
 /// keyword, e.g., struct S, or via a qualified name, e.g., N::M::type,
 /// or both.
 ///
 /// This type is used to keep track of a type name as written in the
 /// source code, including tag keywords and any nested-name-specifiers.
 /// The type itself is always "sugar", used to express what was written
----------------
This documentation needs to be updated given the changes in this patch.  Suggest you remove the first paragraph and flesh out the second paragraph, e.g.

```
/// A sugar type used to keep track of a type name as written in the
/// source code, including any tag keywords (e.g. struct S) and/or any 
/// nested-name-specifiers (e.g. N::M::type).  Note it will even be created
/// for types written *without* tag words or nested-name-specifiers, to
/// properly represent their absence in the written code.
```


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374