[PATCH] D131827: [LoopSimplify][NFC] Replace depth-first order process as depth_first accessor.
luxufan via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Aug 16 08:33:15 PDT 2022
StephenFan added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopSimplify.cpp:731
SmallVector<Loop *, 4> Worklist;
- Worklist.push_back(L);
-
- // Walk the worklist from front to back, pushing newly found sub loops onto
- // the back. This will let us process loops from back to front in depth-first
- // order. We can use this simple process because loops form a tree.
- for (unsigned Idx = 0; Idx != Worklist.size(); ++Idx) {
- Loop *L2 = Worklist[Idx];
- Worklist.append(L2->begin(), L2->end());
- }
+ for_each(depth_first(L),
+ [&Worklist](Loop *SubLoop) { Worklist.push_back(SubLoop); });
----------------
StephenFan wrote:
> reames wrote:
> > This looks wrong. The original loop was pushing elements in inverse depth first order (i.e. from the root down) so that it could walk backwards through that order to get dfs. You seem to be visiting each item in dfs, and adding them to worklist, and then still visiting them in inverse order.
> Thanks! Indeed, I was wrong. I found that the inverse_depth_first iterator accessor might be suitable.
After digging into the implementation detail of `depth_first`, I feel like you may have misunderstood what `depth_first` would do. I found that `depth_first` would return nodes from the root down. So this patch looks correct.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D131827/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D131827
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list