[PATCH] D130891: [Docs] Improve cycle and closed path definitions
Jay Foad via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 3 03:31:18 PDT 2022
foad added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/docs/CycleTerminology.rst:28
+ with respect to this particular DFS. The header is always an entry node.
+4. In any depth-first search starting from the entry, the set of cycles
+ found in the CFG is the same. These are the *top-level cycles*
----------------
Would it make sense to swap 3 and 4, so you can define the "top-level cycles" without even mentioning DFS?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D130891/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D130891
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list