[PATCH] D128877: [LoopCacheAnalysis] Fix a type mismatch bug in cost calculation

[Congzhe Cao via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

congzhe added a comment.

Regarding Michael's question that whether `SE.getNoopOrAnyExtend()` is signed extension or unsigned extension: it is actually well handled in `ScalarEvolution::getAnyExtendExpr()` where it could do either signed or unsigned extension depending on the actual SCEV type of the value we want to extend. I'm wondering if it answers your question? @Meinersbur


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D128877/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D128877