[PATCH] D128645: Update developer policy.
Edd Barrett via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jun 28 02:25:26 PDT 2022
vext01 added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/docs/DeveloperPolicy.rst:419-421
-Your first commit to a repository may require the autogenerated email to be
-approved by a moderator of the mailing list.
-This is normal and will be done when the mailing list owner has time.
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> vext01 wrote:
> > aaron.ballman wrote:
> > > Rather than get rid of this, I think we might actually want to broaden it. I read this blurb as letting folks know that sometimes commit messages take a while before they show up on the commit list. It used to be the primary way that happened was when making a commit for the first time. Now it happens most often for large commits (due to the size of the email content) or a long list of CCs (often added automatically by Herald, though the moderation of these has gotten better in recent history).
> > >
> > > I think it's kind of helpful to let people know that sometimes the automated emails get caught out by moderation. But if others don't think that's of value to mention, then we can go ahead and remove this bit.
> > Actually, now I read it again, I realise that I don't understand what this sentence means:
> >
> > > Your first commit to a repository may require the autogenerated email to be approved by a moderator of the mailing list.
> >
> > My first commit to a llvm repository was via github, and github doesn't discriminate. If you have write-access to the repo, then your push to `main` will surely go ahead. There are no automated emails involved as far as I know.
> >
> > I suspect this prose is from pre-github, where the process was different?
> > Actually, now I read it again, I realise that I don't understand what this sentence means:
>
> Ah, I think I see where the confusion may be coming in.
>
> We have a post-commit hook that pushes all commits to a commits email list: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/ (as an example, there's also commits list for LLVM and others), and it's existed for a *long time*. It used to be that your commits were written to the commits list as though they came from you directly (e.g., https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130225/074838.html), and these days they come in as though from a list bot (e.g., https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20220627/424937.html); check out the from line just below the title to spot the differences. So the old issue was that when you first pushed a commit, you may not have been subscribed to cfe-commits and your commit message wouldn't make it to the lists. Now the issue is that when you push any commit, it might be caught up by moderation filters (this also used to be an issue, but it wasn't the most likely issue for people to hit).
OK, so what do you recommend we do? This prose is currently full of historic details that are confusing/intimidating for a newbie.
Does the sentence still apply, or can we kill it?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D128645/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D128645
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list