[PATCH] D127056: [ORC][ORC_RT] Handle ELF .init_array with non-default priority

Lang Hames via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jun 6 16:55:48 PDT 2022


lhames added inline comments.


================
Comment at: compiler-rt/lib/orc/elfnix_platform.cpp:391
+  using SectionList = std::vector<ExecutorAddrRange>;
+  std::sort(MOJDIs.InitSections.begin(), MOJDIs.InitSections.end(),
+            [](const std::pair<std::string, SectionList> &LHS,
----------------
MaskRay wrote:
> stable_sort
Does ELF make any guarantees about order-of-initialization beyond priority ordering?

We don't currently number `MaterializationUnit`s, so initialization order is already at the mercy of the dependence graph (likely opaque to clients), and the scheduler (if concurrent compilation is enabled). I'm not opposed to stable_sort (I like that it should make run-to-run behavior of `llvm-jitlink` more stable), but it's probably worth a comment that order of initialization is still not guaranteed in general.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D127056/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D127056



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list