[PATCH] D77804: [DAG] Enable ISD::SRL SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits handling inside SimplifyDemandedBits (WIP)

Simon Pilgrim via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon May 30 13:59:56 PDT 2022


RKSimon added inline comments.
Herald added a subscriber: jsji.


================
Comment at: llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/uxtb.ll:112
+; CHECK-NEXT:    orr r0, r0, r1
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    bx lr
   %tmp1 = lshr i32 %p0, 7
----------------
dmgreen wrote:
> RKSimon wrote:
> > RKSimon wrote:
> > > I'm going to take a look at this, but I'm really not familiar with the UXTB matching code, so any pointers would be appreciated.
> > instcombine optimises this as well:
> > ```
> > define i32 @test10(i32 %p0) {
> >   %tmp1 = lshr i32 %p0, 7
> >   %tmp2 = and i32 %tmp1, 16253176
> >   %tmp4 = lshr i32 %p0, 12
> >   %tmp5 = and i32 %tmp4, 458759
> >   %tmp7 = or i32 %tmp5, %tmp2
> >   ret i32 %tmp7
> > }
> > ```
> > which has the same problem:
> > ```
> > _test10:
> > @ %bb.0:
> >         mov     r1, #248
> >         mov     r2, #7
> >         orr     r1, r1, #16252928
> >         orr     r2, r2, #458752
> >         and     r1, r1, r0, lsr #7
> >         and     r0, r2, r0, lsr #12
> >         orr     r0, r0, r1
> >         bx      lr
> > ```
> I was taking a look. The test is super old now, so old that it had signed types when it was originally added.
> 
> I was surprised to see that `and 0x70007` is being recognised via an `and 0xff00ff` tablegen pattern - it goes into SelectionDAGISel::CheckAndMask which checks that the other mask bits are already 0.
> 
> I think that is what this is trying to test - that a smaller and mask still matches the UXTB16. Is it possible to change it to something that still captures that, without relying on the multi-use fold of the %tmp2 not happening?
> 
> Maybe something like this?
> ```
>   %p = and i32 %p0, 3
>   %a = shl i32 65537, %p
>   %b = lshr i32 %a, 1
>   %tmp7 = and i32 %b, 458759
> ```
Thanks for the hint - I'll give it a try


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D77804/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D77804



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list