[PATCH] D125789: FIX the assembly format of the x86 backend to make both clang and gcc happy

[Phoebe Wang via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

pengfei added a comment.

In D125789#3519433 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D125789#3519433>, @sheisc wrote:

> In D125789#3519411 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D125789#3519411>, @pengfei wrote:
>
>> I think another way is to report the issue to GCC. From the perspective of the user, GCC should support both `{%k1} {z}` and `{%k1}{z}`. Then we don't need the clange on LLVM.
>
> Yes. It is a good idea. 
> However, it appears that there is no such white space in the instructions as described in Intel's manuals.
> So I don't know which one should be the correct format.
> Anyway, not a big issue.
> I found this problem when using the fuzzer (i.e. AFL) to build Firefox.

Yeah. This is an interesting question. I didn't notice the difference between LLVM and GCC. I think either way changing here or GCC is OK :)


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D125789/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D125789