[llvm] a694546 - [KnownBits] Add operator==
Nikita Popov via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue May 17 00:39:04 PDT 2022
Author: Nikita Popov
Date: 2022-05-17T09:38:13+02:00
New Revision: a694546f7cdf6fbcacddf229eeff5316e4bd0eae
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a694546f7cdf6fbcacddf229eeff5316e4bd0eae
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a694546f7cdf6fbcacddf229eeff5316e4bd0eae.diff
LOG: [KnownBits] Add operator==
Checking whether two KnownBits are the same is somewhat common,
mainly in test code.
I don't think there is a lot of room for confusion with "determine
what the KnownBits for an icmp eq would be", as that has a
different result type (this is what the eq() method implements,
which returns Optional<bool>).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125692
Added:
Modified:
llvm/include/llvm/Support/KnownBits.h
llvm/lib/Support/KnownBits.cpp
llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp
llvm/unittests/IR/ConstantRangeTest.cpp
llvm/unittests/Support/KnownBitsTest.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/Support/KnownBits.h b/llvm/include/llvm/Support/KnownBits.h
index 1af7130afd9af..84e095e2bbabe 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/Support/KnownBits.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/Support/KnownBits.h
@@ -415,6 +415,12 @@ struct KnownBits {
return KnownBits(Zero.reverseBits(), One.reverseBits());
}
+ bool operator==(const KnownBits &Other) const {
+ return Zero == Other.Zero && One == Other.One;
+ }
+
+ bool operator!=(const KnownBits &Other) const { return !(*this == Other); }
+
void print(raw_ostream &OS) const;
void dump() const;
};
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Support/KnownBits.cpp b/llvm/lib/Support/KnownBits.cpp
index 5ec85061e8501..9f200c2e8e465 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Support/KnownBits.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Support/KnownBits.cpp
@@ -417,9 +417,8 @@ KnownBits KnownBits::mul(const KnownBits &LHS, const KnownBits &RHS,
unsigned BitWidth = LHS.getBitWidth();
assert(BitWidth == RHS.getBitWidth() && !LHS.hasConflict() &&
!RHS.hasConflict() && "Operand mismatch");
- assert(
- (!NoUndefSelfMultiply || (LHS.One == RHS.One && LHS.Zero == RHS.Zero)) &&
- "Self multiplication knownbits mismatch");
+ assert((!NoUndefSelfMultiply || LHS == RHS) &&
+ "Self multiplication knownbits mismatch");
// Compute the high known-0 bits by multiplying the unsigned max of each side.
// Conservatively, M active bits * N active bits results in M + N bits in the
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp
index dc3f32dc90cf0..2418ee29f2ee0 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp
@@ -1077,7 +1077,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombinerImpl::transformZExtICmp(ICmpInst *Cmp, ZExtInst &Zext)
KnownBits KnownLHS = computeKnownBits(LHS, 0, &Zext);
KnownBits KnownRHS = computeKnownBits(RHS, 0, &Zext);
- if (KnownLHS.Zero == KnownRHS.Zero && KnownLHS.One == KnownRHS.One) {
+ if (KnownLHS == KnownRHS) {
APInt KnownBits = KnownLHS.Zero | KnownLHS.One;
APInt UnknownBit = ~KnownBits;
if (UnknownBit.countPopulation() == 1) {
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/IR/ConstantRangeTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/IR/ConstantRangeTest.cpp
index 9aee84eb1d064..b230a21aecd98 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/IR/ConstantRangeTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/IR/ConstantRangeTest.cpp
@@ -2379,8 +2379,7 @@ TEST_F(ConstantRangeTest, ToKnownBits) {
});
// For an empty CR any result would be legal.
if (!CR.isEmptySet()) {
- EXPECT_EQ(ExpectedKnown.One, Known.One);
- EXPECT_EQ(ExpectedKnown.Zero, Known.Zero);
+ EXPECT_EQ(ExpectedKnown, Known);
}
});
}
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/Support/KnownBitsTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/Support/KnownBitsTest.cpp
index c8d27b9a24600..9ef62bb90fcc4 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/Support/KnownBitsTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/Support/KnownBitsTest.cpp
@@ -41,10 +41,9 @@ TEST(KnownBitsTest, AddCarryExhaustive) {
});
});
- KnownBits KnownComputed = KnownBits::computeForAddCarry(
- Known1, Known2, KnownCarry);
- EXPECT_EQ(Known.Zero, KnownComputed.Zero);
- EXPECT_EQ(Known.One, KnownComputed.One);
+ KnownBits KnownComputed =
+ KnownBits::computeForAddCarry(Known1, Known2, KnownCarry);
+ EXPECT_EQ(Known, KnownComputed);
});
});
});
@@ -79,10 +78,9 @@ static void TestAddSubExhaustive(bool IsAdd) {
});
});
- KnownBits KnownComputed = KnownBits::computeForAddSub(
- IsAdd, /*NSW*/false, Known1, Known2);
- EXPECT_EQ(Known.Zero, KnownComputed.Zero);
- EXPECT_EQ(Known.One, KnownComputed.One);
+ KnownBits KnownComputed =
+ KnownBits::computeForAddSub(IsAdd, /*NSW*/ false, Known1, Known2);
+ EXPECT_EQ(Known, KnownComputed);
// The NSW calculation is not precise, only check that it's
// conservatively correct.
@@ -201,32 +199,25 @@ TEST(KnownBitsTest, BinaryExhaustive) {
});
KnownBits ComputedAnd = Known1 & Known2;
- EXPECT_EQ(KnownAnd.Zero, ComputedAnd.Zero);
- EXPECT_EQ(KnownAnd.One, ComputedAnd.One);
+ EXPECT_EQ(KnownAnd, ComputedAnd);
KnownBits ComputedOr = Known1 | Known2;
- EXPECT_EQ(KnownOr.Zero, ComputedOr.Zero);
- EXPECT_EQ(KnownOr.One, ComputedOr.One);
+ EXPECT_EQ(KnownOr, ComputedOr);
KnownBits ComputedXor = Known1 ^ Known2;
- EXPECT_EQ(KnownXor.Zero, ComputedXor.Zero);
- EXPECT_EQ(KnownXor.One, ComputedXor.One);
+ EXPECT_EQ(KnownXor, ComputedXor);
KnownBits ComputedUMax = KnownBits::umax(Known1, Known2);
- EXPECT_EQ(KnownUMax.Zero, ComputedUMax.Zero);
- EXPECT_EQ(KnownUMax.One, ComputedUMax.One);
+ EXPECT_EQ(KnownUMax, ComputedUMax);
KnownBits ComputedUMin = KnownBits::umin(Known1, Known2);
- EXPECT_EQ(KnownUMin.Zero, ComputedUMin.Zero);
- EXPECT_EQ(KnownUMin.One, ComputedUMin.One);
+ EXPECT_EQ(KnownUMin, ComputedUMin);
KnownBits ComputedSMax = KnownBits::smax(Known1, Known2);
- EXPECT_EQ(KnownSMax.Zero, ComputedSMax.Zero);
- EXPECT_EQ(KnownSMax.One, ComputedSMax.One);
+ EXPECT_EQ(KnownSMax, ComputedSMax);
KnownBits ComputedSMin = KnownBits::smin(Known1, Known2);
- EXPECT_EQ(KnownSMin.Zero, ComputedSMin.Zero);
- EXPECT_EQ(KnownSMin.One, ComputedSMin.One);
+ EXPECT_EQ(KnownSMin, ComputedSMin);
// The following are conservatively correct, but not guaranteed to be
// precise.
@@ -476,8 +467,7 @@ TEST(KnownBitsTest, SExtOrTrunc) {
KnownBits Baseline;
InitKnownBits(Baseline, Input.sextOrTrunc(Size));
Test = Test.sextOrTrunc(Size);
- EXPECT_EQ(Test.One, Baseline.One);
- EXPECT_EQ(Test.Zero, Baseline.Zero);
+ EXPECT_EQ(Test, Baseline);
}
}
}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list