[PATCH] D124878: [Bitcode] Include indirect users of BlockAddresses in bitcode

[Wende Tan via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

twd2 added a comment.

In D124878#3503982 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D124878#3503982>, @dexonsmith wrote:

> (A more invasive change would be to index in ValueEnumerator as I suggested, and write a placeholder record in functions that export BlockAddress that can be patched up later somehow after indexing is complete (the patch could point into a new bitcode block). This would probably add more complexity than it'd be worth though...)

Thanks for the explanation. I just leave the current state here: https://reviews.llvm.org/differential/diff/428488/
Maybe we can do this later.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D124878/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D124878