[PATCH] D122766: [clang] Add the flag -ffile-reproducible

Alan Zhao via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri May 6 15:39:16 PDT 2022


ayzhao added a comment.

In D122766#3450348 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122766#3450348>, @dexonsmith wrote:

> In D122766#3450298 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122766#3450298>, @ayzhao wrote:
>
>> So, the general consensus seems to be that we should use backslashes when targeting Windows.
>>
>> I implemented using only backslashes for Windows; however, clang/test/SemaCXX/destructor.cpp <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/test/SemaCXX/destructor.cpp> fails when running on Linux with the following error (among other errors, but the one below is the most important).
>>
>>   ...
>>   error: 'error' diagnostics seen but not expected:
>>     Line 32: '<REDACTED_PATH_TO_LLVM_CHECKOUT_WITH_BACKSLASHES>\\clang\\test\\SemaCXX\\destructor.cpp' file not found
>>   ...
>>
>> The reason for this is that the test has Clang target windows <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/77d2c815f50b20d18f1207e4f442e2cf8eb8cec0/clang/test/SemaCXX/destructor.cpp#L2> and the test also has the statement #include __FILE__ <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/77d2c815f50b20d18f1207e4f442e2cf8eb8cec0/clang/test/SemaCXX/destructor.cpp#L32>.
>>
>> One way to fix this would be to have every macro that accepts a path internally convert the path to the build environment's path format, but TBH I'm not sure. What do you all think?
>
> Wow, `#include __FILE__` is kind of amazing...
>
> It sounds like you're suggesting changing the `#include` directive to start canonicalizing its argument. I'm not a fan of that idea; header search is hard enough to reason about.
>
> I suggest, instead:
>
> - Only canonicalize `__FILE__` for the target platform when there's a command-line flag that suggests it's okay. I suggest adding `-ffile-reproducible`, which could be implied by `-ffile-prefix-map` but also specified separately when `-ffile-prefix-map` isn't being used.
> - When `__FILE__` is being canonicalized, it's okay to fail on `#include __FILE__` if the canonicalized path doesn't work as an argument to `#include` in the current build environment.
>
> This would mean that `-ffile-reproducible` makes `#include __FILE__` non-portable, which would be fine as long as `#include __FILE__` isn't load-bearing for real life usecases. My guess is that it'd be okay?
>
> What do others think?

Patch has been updated to implement `-ffile-reproducible`


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D122766/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D122766



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list