[PATCH] D123318: [SVE][ISel] Ensure explicit gather/scatter offset extension isn't lost.

[Paul Walker via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

This revision was landed with ongoing or failed builds.
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rG59588f0a3d47: [SVE][ISel] Ensure explicit gather/scatter offset extension isn't lost. (authored by paulwalker-arm).

Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D123318/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D123318

Files:
  llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64ISelLowering.cpp
  llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/sve-gather-scatter-addr-opts.ll


Index: llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/sve-gather-scatter-addr-opts.ll
===================================================================
--- llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/sve-gather-scatter-addr-opts.ll
+++ llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/sve-gather-scatter-addr-opts.ll
@@ -374,11 +374,11 @@
   ret <vscale x 2 x i64> %data
 }
 
-; TODO: The generated code is wrong because we've lost the sign extension which
-; defines bits offsets[8:31].
 define <vscale x 4 x i32> @masked_gather_nxv4i32_s8_offsets(i32* %base, <vscale x 4 x i8> %offsets, <vscale x 4 x i1> %mask) #0 {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: masked_gather_nxv4i32_s8_offsets:
 ; CHECK:       // %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ptrue p1.s
+; CHECK-NEXT:    sxtb z0.s, p1/m, z0.s
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    ld1w { z0.s }, p0/z, [x0, z0.s, sxtw #2]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    ret
   %offsets.sext = sext <vscale x 4 x i8> %offsets to <vscale x 4 x i32>
@@ -399,12 +399,13 @@
   ret <vscale x 4 x i32> %data
 }
 
-; TODO: The generated code is wrong because we've lost the sign extension which
-; defines bits offsets[8:31] and we're also replicating offset[31] across
+; TODO: The generated code is wrong because we're replicating offset[31] across
 ; offset[32:63] even though the IR has explicitly zero'd those bits.
 define <vscale x 4 x i32> @masked_gather_nxv4i32_u32s8_offsets(i32* %base, <vscale x 4 x i8> %offsets, <vscale x 4 x i1> %mask) #0 {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: masked_gather_nxv4i32_u32s8_offsets:
 ; CHECK:       // %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ptrue p1.s
+; CHECK-NEXT:    sxtb z0.s, p1/m, z0.s
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    ld1w { z0.s }, p0/z, [x0, z0.s, sxtw #2]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    ret
   %offsets.sext = sext <vscale x 4 x i8> %offsets to <vscale x 4 x i32>
@@ -456,11 +457,11 @@
   ret void
 }
 
-; TODO: The generated code is wrong because we've lost the sign extension which
-; defines bits offsets[8:31].
 define void @masked_scatter_nxv4i32_s8_offsets(i32* %base, <vscale x 4 x i8> %offsets, <vscale x 4 x i1> %mask, <vscale x 4 x i32> %data) #0 {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: masked_scatter_nxv4i32_s8_offsets:
 ; CHECK:       // %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ptrue p1.s
+; CHECK-NEXT:    sxtb z0.s, p1/m, z0.s
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    st1w { z1.s }, p0, [x0, z0.s, sxtw #2]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    ret
   %offsets.sext = sext <vscale x 4 x i8> %offsets to <vscale x 4 x i32>
@@ -481,12 +482,13 @@
   ret void
 }
 
-; TODO: The generated code is wrong because we've lost the sign extension which
-; defines bits offsets[8:31] and we're also replicating offset[31] across
+; TODO: The generated code is wrong because we're replicating offset[31] across
 ; offset[32:63] even though the IR has explicitly zero'd those bits.
 define void @masked_scatter_nxv4i32_u32s8_offsets(i32* %base, <vscale x 4 x i8> %offsets, <vscale x 4 x i1> %mask, <vscale x 4 x i32> %data) #0 {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: masked_scatter_nxv4i32_u32s8_offsets:
 ; CHECK:       // %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ptrue p1.s
+; CHECK-NEXT:    sxtb z0.s, p1/m, z0.s
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    st1w { z1.s }, p0, [x0, z0.s, sxtw #2]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    ret
   %offsets.sext = sext <vscale x 4 x i8> %offsets to <vscale x 4 x i32>
Index: llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64ISelLowering.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64ISelLowering.cpp
+++ llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64ISelLowering.cpp
@@ -4630,9 +4630,13 @@
 }
 
 bool getGatherScatterIndexIsExtended(SDValue Index) {
+  // Ignore non-pointer sized indices.
+  if (Index.getValueType() != MVT::nxv2i64)
+    return false;
+
   unsigned Opcode = Index.getOpcode();
   if (Opcode == ISD::SIGN_EXTEND_INREG)
-    return true;
+    return cast<VTSDNode>(Index.getOperand(1))->getVT() == MVT::nxv2i32;
 
   if (Opcode == ISD::AND) {
     SDValue Splat = Index.getOperand(1);


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D123318.426038.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3709 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20220429/738dea76/attachment.bin>