[PATCH] D122922: [lld][common][lld-macho][lld-coff] Support per-thread allocators and StringSavers
Fangrui Song via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Apr 26 22:37:51 PDT 2022
MaskRay added a comment.
I use chrome as an ELF linker benchmark. After linking `chrome`, delete it, run `ninja -v chrome` to get the linker command line, and invoke the linker command line with `-Wl,--reproduce=/tmp/chrome.tar` to get a reproduce file.
/tmp/c/0: old lld
/tmp/c/1: new lld
I have run the following commands several times and notice that this version is still a bit slower:
% hyperfine --warmup 2 --min-runs 16 "numactl -C 20-27 "{/tmp/c/0,/tmp/c/1}" -flavor gnu @response.txt --threads=8"
Benchmark 1: numactl -C 20-27 /tmp/c/0 -flavor gnu @response.txt --threads=8
Time (mean ± σ): 6.163 s ± 0.107 s [User: 9.653 s, System: 2.674 s]
Range (min … max): 6.047 s … 6.395 s 16 runs
Benchmark 2: numactl -C 20-27 /tmp/c/1 -flavor gnu @response.txt --threads=8
Time (mean ± σ): 6.213 s ± 0.122 s [User: 9.619 s, System: 2.662 s]
Range (min … max): 6.071 s … 6.474 s 16 runs
Summary
'numactl -C 20-27 /tmp/c/0 -flavor gnu @response.txt --threads=8' ran
1.01 ± 0.03 times faster than 'numactl -C 20-27 /tmp/c/1 -flavor gnu @response.txt --threads=8'
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D122922/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D122922
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list