[PATCH] D124143: [lld-macho] Allow dead_strip to work with autohide symbols that cannot be exported
Vincent Lee via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Apr 21 10:30:13 PDT 2022
thevinster added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lld/MachO/MarkLive.cpp:234
// explicitUndefineds code below would handle this automatically.
- assert(!defined->privateExtern &&
- "should have been rejected by driver");
marker->addSym(defined);
continue;
----------------
oontvoo wrote:
> thakis wrote:
> > Should we call addSym for privateExterns? That seems wrong (?)
> > Should we call addSym for privateExterns
>
> normally we shouldn't but if a symbol is both private extern and autohide, then i think it should be ok,
>
> relatedly, stray comment should be deleted or moved?
I thought the comment was referring to the `addSym`, but I don't think it will be changed so I'm happy to remove it.
> if a symbol is both private extern and autohide, then i think it should be ok,
This is what I found from testing as well. Happy to re-add the assert back and only skip it if it is both privateExtern and autohide. I think that's the one I'm fixing in my local builds.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D124143/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D124143
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list