[PATCH] D115907: [misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics

[Teresa Johnson via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

tejohnson added a comment.

lgtm if you are waiting for a re-review. As noted in my previous comment, you have added a little bit of unnecessary checking at the lower end with your new clamp function, since it is an unsigned value and can never go below 0. But it isn't a big deal if you prefer to keep that in to make it easier to transition to std::clamp.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907