[PATCH] D100835: [WIP][LLD][RISCV] Linker Relaxation
Jessica Clarke via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Apr 18 07:58:31 PDT 2022
jrtc27 added a comment.
a could be preempted, so no, it has to go via the PLT for that specific example.
Incidentally, this issue of relaxation correctness is why I want the optimisation relaxations separated out from the alignment support that’s required; I can see the optimisations otherwise holding up supporting but not optimising -mrelax code.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D100835/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D100835
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list