[llvm] 73f5d7d - [VPlan] Handle equal address and store ops in onlyFirstLaneDemanded.

Florian Hahn via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Apr 15 13:53:54 PDT 2022


Author: Florian Hahn
Date: 2022-04-15T22:53:33+02:00
New Revision: 73f5d7d0d6ec0eb474925f1952fd7b6f92024fa1

URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/73f5d7d0d6ec0eb474925f1952fd7b6f92024fa1
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/73f5d7d0d6ec0eb474925f1952fd7b6f92024fa1.diff

LOG: [VPlan] Handle equal address and store ops in onlyFirstLaneDemanded.

With opaque pointers, the stored value and address can be the same.

Previously the code in VPWidenMemoryInstructionRecipe::onlyFirstLaneDemanded
incorrectly considers stores with matching store and pointer operands as
only demanding the first lane, causing a crash.

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlan.h
    llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/opaque-ptr.ll

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlan.h b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlan.h
index c18bf0fb947f7..a3853c7e3c430 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlan.h
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlan.h
@@ -1799,8 +1799,10 @@ class VPWidenMemoryInstructionRecipe : public VPRecipeBase, public VPValue {
            "Op must be an operand of the recipe");
 
     // Widened, consecutive memory operations only demand the first lane of
-    // their address.
-    return Op == getAddr() && isConsecutive();
+    // their address, unless the same operand is also stored. That latter can
+    // happen with opaque pointers.
+    return Op == getAddr() && isConsecutive() &&
+           (!isStore() || Op != getStoredValue());
   }
 };
 

diff  --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/opaque-ptr.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/opaque-ptr.ll
index eef6629ee8950..bf87e9aae0a4f 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/opaque-ptr.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/opaque-ptr.ll
@@ -38,3 +38,60 @@ loop:
 exit:
   ret void
 }
+
+define void @store_pointer_induction(ptr %start, ptr %end) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @store_pointer_induction(
+; CHECK-NEXT:  entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[START2:%.*]] = ptrtoint ptr [[START:%.*]] to i64
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[END1:%.*]] = ptrtoint ptr [[END:%.*]] to i64
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP0:%.*]] = add i64 [[END1]], -8
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP1:%.*]] = sub i64 [[TMP0]], [[START2]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP2:%.*]] = lshr i64 [[TMP1]], 3
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP3:%.*]] = add nuw nsw i64 [[TMP2]], 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[MIN_ITERS_CHECK:%.*]] = icmp ult i64 [[TMP3]], 2
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[MIN_ITERS_CHECK]], label [[SCALAR_PH:%.*]], label [[VECTOR_PH:%.*]]
+; CHECK:       vector.ph:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[N_MOD_VF:%.*]] = urem i64 [[TMP3]], 2
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[N_VEC:%.*]] = sub i64 [[TMP3]], [[N_MOD_VF]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP4:%.*]] = mul i64 [[N_VEC]], 8
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IND_END:%.*]] = getelementptr i8, ptr [[START]], i64 [[TMP4]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[VECTOR_BODY:%.*]]
+; CHECK:       vector.body:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[POINTER_PHI:%.*]] = phi ptr [ [[START]], [[VECTOR_PH]] ], [ [[PTR_IND:%.*]], [[VECTOR_BODY]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[INDEX:%.*]] = phi i64 [ 0, [[VECTOR_PH]] ], [ [[INDEX_NEXT:%.*]], [[VECTOR_BODY]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP5:%.*]] = getelementptr i8, ptr [[POINTER_PHI]], <2 x i64> <i64 0, i64 8>
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP6:%.*]] = extractelement <2 x ptr> [[TMP5]], i32 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP7:%.*]] = getelementptr ptr, ptr [[TMP6]], i32 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    store <2 x ptr> [[TMP5]], ptr [[TMP7]], align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[INDEX_NEXT]] = add nuw i64 [[INDEX]], 2
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[PTR_IND]] = getelementptr i8, ptr [[POINTER_PHI]], i64 16
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP8:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[INDEX_NEXT]], [[N_VEC]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[TMP8]], label [[MIDDLE_BLOCK:%.*]], label [[VECTOR_BODY]], !llvm.loop [[LOOP0:![0-9]+]]
+; CHECK:       middle.block:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[CMP_N:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[TMP3]], [[N_VEC]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[CMP_N]], label [[EXIT:%.*]], label [[SCALAR_PH]]
+; CHECK:       scalar.ph:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[BC_RESUME_VAL:%.*]] = phi ptr [ [[IND_END]], [[MIDDLE_BLOCK]] ], [ [[START]], [[ENTRY:%.*]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[LOOP:%.*]]
+; CHECK:       loop:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IV:%.*]] = phi ptr [ [[BC_RESUME_VAL]], [[SCALAR_PH]] ], [ [[IV_NEXT:%.*]], [[LOOP]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    store ptr [[IV]], ptr [[IV]], align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IV_NEXT]] = getelementptr inbounds ptr, ptr [[IV]], i32 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[EXITCOND:%.*]] = icmp eq ptr [[IV_NEXT]], [[END]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[EXITCOND]], label [[EXIT]], label [[LOOP]], !llvm.loop [[LOOP2:![0-9]+]]
+; CHECK:       exit:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+;
+entry:
+  br label %loop
+
+loop:
+  %iv = phi ptr [ %start, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
+  store ptr %iv, ptr %iv, align 4
+  %iv.next = getelementptr inbounds ptr, ptr %iv, i32 1
+  %exitcond = icmp eq ptr %iv.next, %end
+  br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop
+
+exit:
+  ret void
+}


        


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list