[PATCH] D123694: [AMDGPU][FIX] Let load-store-vectorizer is working with opaque pointers

[Johannes Doerfert via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

jdoerfert updated this revision to Diff 422562.
jdoerfert added a comment.

Clang format


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D123694/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D123694

Files:
  llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoadStoreVectorizer.cpp
  llvm/test/Transforms/LoadStoreVectorizer/AMDGPU/opaque_ptr.ll


Index: llvm/test/Transforms/LoadStoreVectorizer/AMDGPU/opaque_ptr.ll
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ llvm/test/Transforms/LoadStoreVectorizer/AMDGPU/opaque_ptr.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
+; RUN: opt -mtriple=amdgcn-amd-amdhsa -basic-aa -load-store-vectorizer -S -o - %s | FileCheck %s
+
+; Vectorize and emit valid code (Issue #54896).
+
+%S = type { i64, i64 }
+ at S = external global %S
+
+define i64 @order() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @order(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IDX0:%.*]] = getelementptr inbounds [[S:%.*]], ptr @S, i32 0, i32 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP1:%.*]] = load <2 x i64>, ptr [[IDX0]], align 8
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[L01:%.*]] = extractelement <2 x i64> [[TMP1]], i32 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[L12:%.*]] = extractelement <2 x i64> [[TMP1]], i32 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[ADD:%.*]] = add i64 [[L01]], [[L12]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i64 [[ADD]]
+;
+  %idx1 = getelementptr inbounds %S, ptr @S, i32 0, i32 1
+  %l1 = load i64, i64* %idx1, align 8
+  %idx0 = getelementptr inbounds %S, ptr @S, i32 0, i32 0
+  %l0 = load i64, i64* %idx0, align 8
+  %add = add i64 %l0, %l1
+  ret i64 %add
+}
Index: llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoadStoreVectorizer.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoadStoreVectorizer.cpp
+++ llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoadStoreVectorizer.cpp
@@ -1297,10 +1297,11 @@
     CV->replaceAllUsesWith(V);
   }
 
-  // Bitcast might not be an Instruction, if the value being loaded is a
-  // constant. In that case, no need to reorder anything.
-  if (Instruction *BitcastInst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Bitcast))
-    reorder(BitcastInst);
+  // Since we might have opaque pointers we might end up using the pointer
+  // operand of the first load (wrt. memory loaded) for the vector load. Since
+  // this first load might not be the first in the block we potentially need to
+  // reorder the pointer operand (and its operands).
+  reorder(LI);
 
   eraseInstructions(Chain);
 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D123694.422562.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2073 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20220413/89fb3ebf/attachment.bin>