[PATCH] D122485: [SimplifyCFG] Fold mutil cases to And mask
chenglin.bi via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Apr 13 07:02:34 PDT 2022
bcl5980 added a comment.
In D122485#3448283 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122485#3448283>, @spatel wrote:
> In D122485#3448273 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122485#3448273>, @bcl5980 wrote:
>
>> In D122485#3448240 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122485#3448240>, @spatel wrote:
>>
>>> Let's add the baseline tests as an NFC commit now, so it is easier to see the diffs.
>>>
>>> The order of the transforms creates an interesting trade-off, so we need a test like this (and probably even more tests):
>>>
>>> define i8 @same_value_two_case(i32 %i) {
>>> entry:
>>> switch i32 %i, label %default [
>>> i32 -3, label %end
>>> i32 5, label %end
>>> ]
>>>
>>> default:
>>> br label %end
>>>
>>> end:
>>> %t0 = phi i8 [ 42, %default ], [ 3, %entry ], [ 3, %entry ]
>>> ret i8 %t0
>>> }
>>
>> I'm sorry but what's the difference between this test with switch_to_and0 ? For the negative offset?
>
> Ah, you're correct - I did not see that test diff. But we might want to include a test with negative offset, so we have coverage for that too.
@spatel I feel so sorry that I check in the baseline test here rGe2d77a160c <https://reviews.llvm.org/rGe2d77a160c5b8141eca3db1fca6dafd97e78288d> with a wrong issue number(show be #39957 but I write #54649).
Can I amend the commit message now?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D122485/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D122485
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list