[PATCH] D122079: [ADT] add initializer list specialization for is_contained
Jakub Kuderski via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Mar 29 08:52:47 PDT 2022
kuhar added a comment.
Could you also add some tests that make sure this can be constant-evaluated? (e.g., with `static_assert`)
Also, would be good to have a couple of tests with non-enum types (e.g., some trivial type like `int` and some class with a copy constructor etc.)
================
Comment at: llvm/unittests/ADT/STLExtrasTest.cpp:976
+
+TEST(STLExtrasTest, IsContainedInitializerList) {
+ {
----------------
Can you add an extra test case with an empty set of things to match against?
================
Comment at: llvm/unittests/ADT/STLExtrasTest.cpp:979
+ bool Val = is_contained(Woofer, {Woofer, SubWoofer});
+ ASSERT_TRUE(Val);
+ }
----------------
These should be EXPECT_TRUE.
ASSERT_TRUE are for when you can't continue executing a test after a failure
================
Comment at: llvm/unittests/ADT/STLExtrasTest.cpp:979
+ bool Val = is_contained(Woofer, {Woofer, SubWoofer});
+ ASSERT_TRUE(Val);
+ }
----------------
kuhar wrote:
> These should be EXPECT_TRUE.
>
> ASSERT_TRUE are for when you can't continue executing a test after a failure
Also, put the call directly inside the check: `EXPECT_TRUE(is_contained(...))`.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D122079/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D122079
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list