[PATCH] D114543: Extend the `uwtable` attribute with unwind table kind

Momchil Velikov via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jan 31 01:22:23 PST 2022


chill added a comment.

In D114543#3280816 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D114543#3280816>, @efriedma wrote:

> In D114543#3275683 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D114543#3275683>, @chill wrote:
>
>> By  "two values",  do you mean two separate attributes?  Would you like to discuss this idea in this thread https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-November/153768.html ?
>
> I don't really have a preference about `uwtable_asynchronous` vs. `uwtable((asynchronous))` or whatever.  I just don't want the literal numbers "1" and "2" in IR.

Yep, I think I'm going with `uwtable`, `uwtable(sync)`, and `uwtable(async)`.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D114543/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D114543



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list