[PATCH] D114543: Extend the `uwtable` attribute with unwind table kind
Momchil Velikov via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jan 31 01:22:23 PST 2022
chill added a comment.
In D114543#3280816 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D114543#3280816>, @efriedma wrote:
> In D114543#3275683 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D114543#3275683>, @chill wrote:
>
>> By "two values", do you mean two separate attributes? Would you like to discuss this idea in this thread https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-November/153768.html ?
>
> I don't really have a preference about `uwtable_asynchronous` vs. `uwtable((asynchronous))` or whatever. I just don't want the literal numbers "1" and "2" in IR.
Yep, I think I'm going with `uwtable`, `uwtable(sync)`, and `uwtable(async)`.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D114543/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D114543
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list