[PATCH] D117832: Update the Bug Life Cycle docs for the switch to GitHub issues

[Aaron Ballman via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

aaron.ballman added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/docs/BugLifeCycle.rst:77-79
+* When able to do so, please add the appropriate labels to classify the bug,
+  such as the tool (``clang``, ``clang-format``, ``clang-tidy``, etc) or
+  component (``backend:<name>``, ``compiler-rt:<name>``, ``clang:<name>``, etc).
----------------
Quuxplusone wrote:
> If you think it would be uncontroversial, I'd add:
> ```
> * Don't use both a general and a specific label; for example, bugs labeled ``c++17`` shouldn't also have ``c++``, and bugs labeled ``clang:codegen`` shouldn't also have ``clang``.
> ```
> (but if you think that's opening a can of worms for this PR, then ignore me)
I think this is reasonable, so I added the words. If others find it to be controversial, I can remove the bullet easily enough.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D117832/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D117832