[PATCH] D117832: Update the Bug Life Cycle docs for the switch to GitHub issues

[Aaron Ballman via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

aaron.ballman added a comment.

In D117832#3259547 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D117832#3259547>, @tstellar wrote:

>> A few things to note: we have not yet created the confirmed label, but that is expected to be done shortly. There is already label confusion involving whether we should use beginner (89 issues) or good first issue (29 issues), so I went with beginner in the documentation. I think we should strongly discourage users from creating arbitrary labels on their own because the labels will become useless pretty quickly if there's no consistency as to which are used, so I adjusted the docs accordingly
>
> 'good first issue' is a default label provided by GitHub, so it seems like it would be good to use it for consistency with other projects.  Is the beginner label something that was created during the github transition?

I think what happened is that Bugzilla had a tag for `beginner` and it didn't get translated to `good first issue` when we migrated. See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51656 and https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52314 as an example (note the keyword use in Bugzilla).

I can switch to using `good first issue` in the docs, but it'd be nice if we could migrate the `beginner` tag to `good first issue` and then remove the `beginner` tag to reduce confusion.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D117832/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D117832