[PATCH] D116832: [UpdateLLCTestChecks] Allow replacing register names with variables
Phoebe Wang via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jan 18 22:47:46 PST 2022
pengfei added a comment.
> If the instructions basically keep the same number of register operands and the number of instructions remains the same, I think the FileCheck variable names should remain stable.
No, assuming we have a test case:
define i32 @foo(i32 %0, i32 %0, i32 %0)
; CHECK: # %bb.0:
; CHECK-NEXT: add %R0, %R1
; CHECK-NEXT: add %R0, %R2
; CHECK-NEXT: other_use_def %R1
; CHECK-NEXT: other_use_def %R2
A patch that only exchanges the order of the first add to
; CHECK-NEXT: add %R0, %R2
; CHECK-NEXT: add %R0, %R1
Then, the other use and def of %R1 <https://reviews.llvm.org/diffusion/L/> and %R2 <https://reviews.llvm.org/source/clang-tools-extra/> will remain unchanged.
But if you are numbering the register by order, all the other %R1 <https://reviews.llvm.org/diffusion/L/> and %R2 <https://reviews.llvm.org/source/clang-tools-extra/> will be changed while the expected change won't be shown. This is rather confusing.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D116832/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D116832
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list