[PATCH] D117416: [clang-format] Handle C variables with name that matches c++ access specifier

[MyDeveloperDay via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

MyDeveloperDay added a comment.

Isn't the reality that developers using `delete/new/try/catch/interface/public/protected/private/async/var/let` as variables the real problem? I'm slightly averse to pandering to them, and I definitely don't want to make my world more complex just to accommodate their poor choice of variable name.

I know if someone used any of those words as variables in LLVM surely we'd tell them to change it. Honestly how much of a problem are we really talking about here that can't be handled by a few corner cases.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D117416/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D117416