[PATCH] D116270: [AMDGPU] Enable divergence-driven XNOR selection

Jay Foad via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jan 10 02:20:01 PST 2022


foad added a comment.

In D116270#3209307 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D116270#3209307>, @alex-t wrote:

> This looks like a regression in xnor.ll :
>
>   	s_not_b32 s0, s0                        	v_not_b32_e32 v0, v0
>   	v_xor_b32_e32 v0, s0, v0                        v_xor_b32_e32 v0, s4, v0
>
> but it is not really.  All the nodes in the example are divergent and the divergent ( xor, x -1) is selected to V_NOT_B32 as of https://reviews.llvm.org/D115884 has been committed.
> S_NOT_B32 appears at the left because of the custom optimization that converts S_XNOR_B32 back to NOT (XOR) for the targets which have no V_XNOR. This optimization relies on the fact that if the NOT operand is SGPR and V_XOR_B32_e32 can accept SGPR as a first source operand.
> I am not sure if it is always safe. The VALU instructions execution is controlled by the EXEC mask but SALU is not.

To repeat what I have already said elsewhere: this is **not** a correctness issue. This is just an optimization, where you can choose to calculate either `~s0 ^ v0` or `s0 ^ ~v0` (or `~(s0 ^ v0)`) and get exactly the same result. The optimization is to prefer the first form, because the intermediate result `~s0` is uniform, so you can keep it in an sgpr and not waste vgprs and valu instructions.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D116270/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D116270



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list