[PATCH] D115604: [Support] Expand `<@>` as the base directory in response files.

[Jack Andersen via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

jackoalan added a comment.

> 1. It it possible to limit the new syntax to config files only? It would avoid concerns of gcc compatibility.

Yes, ultimately this use case only calls for extending config files.

> Is it possible to use more understandable designation, like `<CONFIG>` or something similar?

I agree, keyword directives like this would be more flexible in the long term and the use of shell redirection characters would theoretically protect any general purpose word. For now, I think it is acceptable to consume `<CONFIG>` as a singular token, but in the future, generic `<(.*)>` tokenization may be worth adding.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D115604/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D115604