[PATCH] D114528: [LV] Make sure VF doesn't exceed compile time known TC
Evgeniy via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Dec 13 03:15:02 PST 2021
ebrevnov added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:6085
+ "exceeding the constant trip count: "
<< ConstTripCount << "\n");
+ return ElementCount::getFixed(PowerOf2Floor(ConstTripCount));
----------------
fhahn wrote:
> fhahn wrote:
> > ebrevnov wrote:
> > > dmgreen wrote:
> > > > fhahn wrote:
> > > > > Shouldn't this be `PowerOf2Floor(ConstTripCount)`?
> > > > I think this is saying "the trip count is "ConstTripCount", so we are rounding that down to a power of 2 (left as an exercise to the reader)."
> > > >
> > > > It may be better to be clearer about the values it will use though. Having what it thinks the original ConstTripCount printed somewhere does sound useful.
> > > > I think this is saying "the trip count is "ConstTripCount", so we are rounding that down to a power of 2 (left as an exercise to the reader)."
> > > While I agree this is valid interpretation I did mean to provide resulting value. So the printing PowerOf2Floor(ConstTripCount) here sounds reasonable to me. Do you think we should change wording?
> > >
> > > >
> > > > It may be better to be clearer about the values it will use though. Having what it thinks the original ConstTripCount printed somewhere does sound useful.
> > > It is printed out at the beginning of computeFeasibleMaxVF.
> > >
> > > While I agree this is valid interpretation I did mean to provide resulting value. So the printing PowerOf2Floor(ConstTripCount) here sounds reasonable to me. Do you think we should change wording?
> >
> > I think the wording is fine when printing `ClampedConstTripCount`. As you said, the original trip count is printed earlier. It could also be included in the message `(known trip count: ...)` or something similar, but I am not sure if it adds a lot of additional info.
> IIUC there was some consensus to use `ClampedConstTripCount` in the message and maybe include `ConstTripCount` in addition to that. But it looks like the committed version has not been updated accordingly and just prints the `ConstTripCount`. Did I miss anything?
You didn't... that was my overlook.. will fix shortly. Thanks!
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D114528/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D114528
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list