[PATCH] D115356: [LV] Remove what seems like stale code in collectElementTypesForWidening.
Sander de Smalen via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Dec 8 08:44:24 PST 2021
sdesmalen created this revision.
Herald added a subscriber: hiraditya.
sdesmalen requested review of this revision.
Herald added a project: LLVM.
Herald added a subscriber: llvm-commits.
This was originally added in rG22174f5d5af1eb15b376c6d49e7925cbb7cca6be <https://reviews.llvm.org/rG22174f5d5af1eb15b376c6d49e7925cbb7cca6be>
although that patch doesn't really mention any reasons for ignoring the
pointer type in this calculation if the memory access isn't consecutive.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
https://reviews.llvm.org/D115356
Files:
llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/vector_ptr_load_store.ll
Index: llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/vector_ptr_load_store.ll
===================================================================
--- llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/vector_ptr_load_store.ll
+++ llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/vector_ptr_load_store.ll
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
; p[i][y] = (int*) (1 + q[i]);
; }
; CHECK: test_nonconsecutive_store
-; CHECK: LV: The Smallest and Widest types: 16 / 16 bits.
+; CHECK: LV: The Smallest and Widest types: 16 / 64 bits.
; CHECK: LV: Selecting VF: 1
define void @test_nonconsecutive_store() nounwind ssp uwtable {
br label %1
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@
;; However, we should not take unconsecutive loads of pointers into account.
; CHECK: test_nonconsecutive_ptr_load
-; CHECK: LV: The Smallest and Widest types: 16 / 16 bits.
+; CHECK: LV: The Smallest and Widest types: 16 / 64 bits.
; CHECK: LV: Selecting VF: 1
define void @test_nonconsecutive_ptr_load() nounwind ssp uwtable {
br label %1
Index: llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
+++ llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
@@ -6075,17 +6075,7 @@
if (auto *ST = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(&I))
T = ST->getValueOperand()->getType();
- // Ignore loaded pointer types and stored pointer types that are not
- // vectorizable.
- //
- // FIXME: The check here attempts to predict whether a load or store will
- // be vectorized. We only know this for certain after a VF has
- // been selected. Here, we assume that if an access can be
- // vectorized, it will be. We should also look at extending this
- // optimization to non-pointer types.
- //
- if (T->isPointerTy() && !isConsecutiveLoadOrStore(&I) &&
- !isAccessInterleaved(&I) && !isLegalGatherOrScatter(&I))
+ if (!T->isSized())
continue;
ElementTypesInLoop.insert(T);
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D115356.392800.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2018 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20211208/cc446abd/attachment.bin>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list